Free checklist

Twelve things to check before you trust a certificate of analysis.

Most certificates are read for one number and then filed. The other eleven checks below are where the actual information is, and where a decorative PDF separates from a laboratory report. Nothing here is for sale and nothing on this page will try to sell you a vial.

  1. 01

    The batch number on the document matches the vial

    Does the lot or batch identifier on the certificate appear on the physical label?

    If it is missing: A certificate for a different run tells you nothing about what you are holding. This is the most common substitution and the easiest to catch.

  2. 02

    The laboratory is named, and it is not the seller

    Is there a laboratory name, address, and report number on the document?

    If it is missing: An unbranded template with no laboratory identity is a self-test. Independence is the entire point of third-party analysis.

  3. 03

    The report carries a date, and the date is recent

    When was the analysis run, relative to when the batch was produced?

    If it is missing: An undated report cannot be tied to a production run. A years-old report attached to current stock is a report about different material.

  4. 04

    The HPLC chromatogram is shown, not just the percentage

    Can you see the trace, the retention time, and the integration?

    If it is missing: A bare 99.4% is unverifiable. The trace is where a wide peak concealing shoulder impurities becomes visible.

  5. 05

    The chromatogram has one dominant peak

    Is there a single sharp principal peak, or several competing ones?

    If it is missing: Multiple significant peaks mean multiple species. Integration choices can make that look clean in the summary figure.

  6. 06

    Mass spec confirms identity, not just purity

    Is there an ESI-MS result with observed against theoretical molecular weight?

    If it is missing: Purity answers how much of one thing is present. Without mass spec, nothing establishes that the one thing is the sequence you ordered.

  7. 07

    The observed mass sits inside instrument tolerance

    Does the observed figure match theoretical within the stated tolerance?

    If it is missing: A mass off by a residue or a common adduct is a different molecule. The number is printed; it is rarely checked.

  8. 08

    Endotoxin is reported in EU/mg

    Is there an LAL result with an actual number and a unit?

    If it is missing: This is the most-skipped panel in the market, because it is the one most likely to fail. Absence is a result.

  9. 09

    Residual solvents were screened

    Is there a GC screen covering acetonitrile and TFA?

    If it is missing: Residual solvent displaces peptide mass and can interfere with sensitive assays. Unscreened means unknown, not zero.

  10. 10

    Net peptide content is stated separately from vial weight

    Does the document distinguish peptide mass from total lyophilised mass?

    If it is missing: Water and counter-ion salt count toward the labelled milligrams. Two vials at identical purity can differ materially in actual content.

  11. 11

    The sequence is printed and matches the compound named

    Is the amino acid sequence on the document, and does it correspond?

    If it is missing: Naming errors and near-sequence substitutions are caught here and essentially nowhere else.

  12. 12

    The document is a report, not an image of a report

    Is it a laboratory-generated PDF with selectable text and intact metadata?

    If it is missing: A flattened screenshot removes every trace of provenance and is trivially editable before flattening.

Want this as a printable one-pager?

Join the reference list and we will send the checklist in a format you can keep next to the bench, plus new peptide profiles, vendor score changes, and safety alerts as they publish.

Reference updates only. No sales mail, and we never share or sell your address.

Keep going